Opinion

State v. Porter

  • 125 Mont. 503
  • 242 P.2d 984
  • 1952 Mont. LEXIS 110
Court
Montana Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 12, 1952
Status
Published
Author
Freebourn
On the bench
Metcalf, Freebourn, Adair, Bottomly, Angstman
Cited by
17 cases

not criminal attempt to bribe a juror when defendant offered bribe to someone he mistakenly believed to be a juror

How later courts described this case

  • not criminal attempt to bribe a juror when defendant offered bribe to someone he mistakenly believed to be a juror

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

MR. JUSTICE FREEBOURN

concurring in the reversal of the judgment but dissenting from that part of the opinion which remanded the case for a new trial :

I believe that the information should be dismissed because there was an utter failure to prove the material allegations of the information by competent and satisfactory evidence.

Defendant was charged with attempting to influence Matthew S. Vook, a grand juror, in respect to his decision in matters pending before the grand jury “by means of threats, intimidation, persuasion, and entreaty, and by means of promises to pay to said Matthew S. Vook, as such juror, lawful money of the United States. ’ ’

Vook testified, on cross-examination:

“Q. Mr. Vook, did Roger Porter offer you or tender you at any time during the entire grand jury one dime of United States money? A. No, he didn’t offer me no money.

“Q. Did he threaten you or intimidate you in any way? A. He didn’t threaten me.

“Q. Did he send you any letter or communications that threatened or intimidated you in any way? A. No, sir.”

On direct examination Vook testified:

“A. Well, I’m not certain really what was said on either night. * * * I think it was the third or fourth — the third time, or something like that; when he asked me to help try to keep his name out of the paper. * * * Well, he did tell me he would like to have his name kept out of the paper because it would hurt his family, would hurt his father, too. * * *

*517 ‘1Q. Will you state whether or not he asked you to help him keep his name out of the paper? A. Well, what he told me, he said: ‘If you will help me, I’ll help you.’ # ® *

“A. Well, he asked me to help him out.

“Q. In what way? A. Well, he asked me to keep his name out of the paper, it would hurt his kid, kill his dad, and a few other things like that. s:' * *

“Q. Will you state whether or not he said anything about your being on the jury costing you any money? A. Well, I couldn’t really say that was him said that or myself. That it would cost me money.

“Q. Will you state whether or not he said anything about maybe being able to help make up any loss? A. I believe he said he would help me out, Yes.

“Q. Was that in connection with his statement if you would help him, he would help you? A. I believe it was. I thought it was nothing but a joke from the start.”

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.