Opinion

Parks v. MacRo-dynamics, Inc.

  • 121 Ariz. 517
  • 591 P.2d 1005
  • 1979 Ariz. App. LEXIS 393
Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Filed
Feb 22, 1979
Status
Published
Author
Howard
On the bench
Hathaway, Howard, Richmond
Cited by
56 cases

“out-of-pocket expenses necessary to perform the contract prior to discovering the fraud” are recoverable under the ACFA

How later courts described this case

  • “out-of-pocket expenses necessary to perform the contract prior to discovering the fraud” are recoverable under the ACFA
  • damages under ACFA include “out-of-pocket expenses necessary to perform the contract prior to discovering the fraud”
  • “If matters outside the complaint are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion is one for summary judgment, provided all parties are given a reasonable opportunity to present their factual claims to the court.”
  • applying Ariz.R.Civ.P. 9(b), which is identical to Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), to both statutory and common law fraud claims

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

HOWARD, Judge,

specially concurring.

I concur in the result but for the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in Peery v. Hansen, supra, I do not agree that the Consumer Fraud Act creates a private claim for relief.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.