Opinion

Derby v. Police Pension and Relief Board

  • 159 Colo. 468
  • 412 P.2d 897
  • 1966 Colo. LEXIS 751
Court
Supreme Court of Colorado
Filed
Apr 4, 1966
Status
Published
Author
Pringle
On the bench
Schauer, Pringle, Frantz
Cited by
11 cases

The opinion

Mr. Justice Pringle

concurring in part and dissenting in part:

With respect to contributions made to the Police Pension and Relief Fund by the named plaintiffs after June 1, 1947, I am in complete accord with the philosophy and result of the majority opinion. However, I do not agree that the same principles can be applied to payments made to the Pension Fund by the named plaintiffs by way of deductions from salary before June 1, 1947.

Article XX of the Colorado Constitution provides that officers in the Classified Civil Service should receive a stated salary, the amount of which shall be fixed by the charter. As a condition of their employment, the named plaintiffs were required to suffer a deduction from their salary for payment into the pension fund. *478 It matters not, as I see it, that they may have received some benefit from this deduction. The organic law under which the City and County of Denver operates prohibits the City from, under any guise, reducing the salary of a Police Officer below the amount set by charter provision. The charter amendment of June 1, 1947 provided for a contribution to the pension fund to be deducted from salary. Before that date, in my view, the charter did not permit the City to require such a deduction.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.