Opinion

Diamond v. Bland

  • 3 Cal. 3d 653
  • 91 Cal. Rptr. 501
  • 477 P.2d 733
  • 1970 Cal. LEXIS 236
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 16, 1970
Status
Published
Author
McCOMB
On the bench
Mosk, McComb
Cited by
51 cases

parties may restrict speech in order to prevent "obstruction of or undue interference with normal business operations"

How later courts described this case

  • parties may restrict speech in order to prevent "obstruction of or undue interference with normal business operations"

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

McCOMB, J.

I dissent. I would affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed by Mr. Justice Gardner in the opinion prepared by him for the Court of Appeal in Diamond v. Bland (Cal.App.) 87 Cal.Rptr. 97 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.