Opinion

Curliss v. State

  • 692 P.2d 559
  • 1984 OK CR 98
  • 1984 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 214
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Nov 30, 1984
Status
Published
Author
Parks
On the bench
Bussey, Brett, Parks
Cited by
5 cases

The opinion

PARKS, Judge, specially

concurring:

I concur in the results of this decision; however I feel it also necessary to note my objection to the prosecutor’s comment quoted in Judge Bussey’s Opinion. Even though the comments were invited by defense counsel, the prosecutor strayed close to prejudicial comments and reversible error.

It is clear that there was strong circumstantial evidence against the defendant, and it is not apparent that there was any prejudicial effect that swayed the jury’s verdict.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.