Opinion

DeFunis v. Odegaard

  • 84 Wash. 2d 617
  • 529 P.2d 438
  • 1974 Wash. LEXIS 768
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 12, 1974
Status
Published
Author
Brachtenbach
On the bench
Hamilton, Finley, Hale
Cited by
35 cases

“Class actions are specialized types of suits, and as a general rule must be brought and maintained in strict conformity with the requirements of CR 23.”

How later courts described this case

  • “Class actions are specialized types of suits, and as a general rule must be brought and maintained in strict conformity with the requirements of CR 23.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*635 Brachtenbach, J.

(concurring in part; dissenting in part) —By concurring in the opinion by Justice Finley I do not intend to express any opinion as to the merits of the case. I did not participate in the original decision as I was not then a member of the court. My function is thus limited to joining with Justice Hamilton in holding that this matter, at this stage, is not convertible to a class action and agreeing with Justice Finley’s dissent as to reinstatement of the original opinion. I view neither action as reaching the merits.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.