Opinion

Vance by and Through Vance v. Thomas

  • 716 P.2d 710
  • 1986 OK CIV APP 3
  • 1986 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 39
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Mar 4, 1986
Status
Published
Author
Bacon
On the bench
Means, Rapp, Bacon
Cited by
8 cases

providing a BB gun to a minor

How later courts described this case

  • providing a BB gun to a minor

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BACON, Judge,

specially concurring.

I concur and would like to add that summary judgment for defendants is not proper when the pleadings and evidence show that defendants sent a ten-year-old, an eight-year-old, a six-year-old, a two-year-old, and a one-year-old child into a closed bedroom with a loaded BB gun. I would go one step further and take judicial notice that a BB gun is a dangerous instrumentality. Anyone who does not agree should try convincing a person who has lost his sight in a BB gun accident that such guns are not dangerous. I see no difference between this case and one where a parent sends five children under ten years of age into a closed bedroom where there is a fan running without a guard, a biting bulldog, or a loaded twelve-gauge shotgun. That parent is liable whether a city ordinance was violated or whether the parent’s child was the one who ultimately discharged the weapon.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.