Opinion

Randol v. Newberg Public School Board

  • 23 Or. App. 425
  • 542 P.2d 938
  • 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 1002
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Nov 24, 1975
Status
Published
Author
Thornton
On the bench
Schwab, Langtry, Thornton
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 5.1%

The opinion

THORNTON, J.,

specially concurring.

I agree with the majority that the defendant school board had the legal authority to adopt the challenged no smoking regulation and to suspend petitioner for violating it.

The majority seems to base its conclusion on the *428 rationale of Neuhaus v. Federico, 12 Or App 314 , 505 P2d 939 , Sup Ct review denied (1973), which I believe to have been incorrectly decided.

Accordingly, I wish to be recorded as concurring here for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion in Neuhaus .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.