Opinion

Hassett v. State

  • 127 Idaho 313
  • 900 P.2d 221
  • 1995 Ida. App. LEXIS 92
Court
Idaho Court of Appeals
Filed
Jul 25, 1995
Status
Published
Author
Carey
On the bench
Walters, Carey
Cited by
205 cases
Authority
More cited than 5.1%

upholding district court’s summary dismissal of application for post-conviction relief where district court clearly expressed its inclination not to reduce applicant’s sentence

How later courts described this case

  • upholding district court’s summary dismissal of application for post-conviction relief where district court clearly expressed its inclination not to reduce applicant’s sentence

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

CAREY, Judge Pro Tem.,

specially concurring.

I concur in the analysis and the result, which also are supported by the recent case of McDonald v. State, 124 Idaho 103 , 856 P.2d 893 (Ct.App.1992). In McDonald the Court of Appeals intimated that a post-conviction hearing may be unnecessary if the trial judge determines that his or her discretionary decision will not change even if the allegations in the application for post-conviction relief are true and even if the application shows that the original proceedings may have been tainted by legal or factual error.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.