Opinion

Brown v. MFC Finance Co. of Oklahoma

63 O.B.A.J. 3234
838 P.2d 524
8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 29
1992 OK CIV APP 54
1992 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 71

Court: Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed: Apr 28, 1992
Status: Published
Author: Jones
On the bench: Hansen, Vice-Chief, Jones, Hunter
Cited by: 5 cases
Authority: More cited than 5.0%

applying pretext analysis to a retaliatory discharge claim

How later courts described this case

applying pretext analysis to a retaliatory discharge claim
employee’s jury service statutorily protected against employer’s retaliatory discharge by 38 O.S.1991, § 35

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

JONES, Judge

concurring in result:

The utilization of analysis applicable to 85 O.S.1981, § 5 in this action under 38 O.S.Supp.1987, § 35 is unnecessary in this case and contrary to the precepts discussed in Hinson v. Cameron, 742 P.2d 549 (Okla.1987) at p. 553.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.