Opinion

Acosta v. County of Los Angeles

  • 56 Cal. 2d 208
  • 14 Cal. Rptr. 433
  • 363 P.2d 473
  • 88 A.L.R. 2d 1417
  • 1961 Cal. LEXIS 283
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 3, 1961
Status
Published
Author
McCOMB
On the bench
White, McComb
Cited by
15 cases

bicyclist permitted to seek recovery for defect in sidewalk even though bicycle riding prohibited

How later courts described this case

  • bicyclist permitted to seek recovery for defect in sidewalk even though bicycle riding prohibited

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

McCOMB, J.

I dissent. I would affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed by Mr. Presiding Justice Shinn in the opinion prepared by him for the District Court of Appeal, Acosta v. County of Los Angeles, (Cal.App.) 10 Cal. Rptr. 222 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.