Opinion

Roy v. City of Everett

  • 118 Wash. 2d 352
  • 823 P.2d 1084
  • 1992 Wash. LEXIS 40
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 6, 1992
Status
Published
Author
Andersen
On the bench
Dolliver, Andersen, Dore
Cited by
24 cases

holding that Snohomish County was not immune from suit based on alleged failure to uphold duties under the DVA

How later courts described this case

  • holding that Snohomish County was not immune from suit based on alleged failure to uphold duties under the DVA

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Andersen, J.

(concurring in the result) — This case has proceeded no further than the pleading stage. Upon reviewing the record before us, it cannot fairly be said that there is "no genuine issue as to any material fact" as required before a summary judgment may be entered. See CR 56(c). Accordingly, the trial court did not err in denying the motions for summary judgment here in question.

Guy, J., concurs with Andersen, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.