Opinion

Dan Bunn, Inc. v. Brown

  • 285 Or. 131
  • 590 P.2d 209
  • 1979 Ore. LEXIS 838
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 7, 1979
Status
Published
Author
Linde
On the bench
Denecke, C.J., and Tongue, Bryson and Linde
Cited by
28 cases

stating that conditions precedent are facts that arise subsequent to the formation of the contract that must exist or occur before there is a right to expect performance from the other side

How later courts described this case

  • stating that conditions precedent are facts that arise subsequent to the formation of the contract that must exist or occur before there is a right to expect performance from the other side
  • “ ‘Conditions precedent’ are those facts and events, occurring subsequently to the making of a valid contract, that must exist or occur before there is a right to immediate performance, before there is a breach of contract duty, before the usual judicial remedies are available.” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • use of “subject to” “clearly indicated an intent to impose a condition precedent”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

LINDE, J.,

concurring.

I agree that the parties rescinded the original contract in return for a nonconditional promise by defendants to pay plaintiff $50,000. I am not persuaded that defendants could rely on the lack of a favorable report on tentative subdivision approval as a condition relieving them of the obligation to go through with the sale to plaintiff, but in view of the rescission, I need not pursue that disagreement with the majority opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.