Opinion

Irvin v. State

  • 617 P.2d 588
  • 1980 OK CR 70
  • 1980 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 187
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Aug 29, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Brett
On the bench
Cornish, Brett, Bussey
Cited by
84 cases

where there is not evidence to support a lower degree of the crime charged, or an included offense, the court has no right to ask the jury to consider the issue

How later courts described this case

  • where there is not evidence to support a lower degree of the crime charged, or an included offense, the court has no right to ask the jury to consider the issue
  • No error occurred where trial judge instructed jury that it was not to consider pardon and parole
  • where no evidence supports requested second-degree murder instruction, unnecessary to instruct thereon

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BRETT, Judge,

specially concurring:

I concur and am compelled to expand upon the majority’s treatment of the final assignments of error under Section XIV, supra.

There is a statute more specifically on point, and the rules of statutory construction favor not only that statutes be interpreted consistently with each other but also that specific statutes take precedence over general statutes. See C. D. Sands, Sutherland’s Statutory Construction (4th Ed. 1972), § 51.02, Statutes on the Same Subject Construed Together.

As the majority states, even ordinary criminal trials can result in a judicial verdict of punishment when the jury cannot reach a unanimous punishment verdict. This, however, was a capital case. The question that becomes crucial is: Must the jury’s punishment verdict be unanimous? The answer is compound: Yes, the jury must reach a unanimous determination of the death penalty; and no, the jury is not required to reach a unanimous verdict. The statute provides, “If the jury cannot, within a reasonable time, agree as to punishment, the judge shall dismiss the jury and impose a sentence of imprisonment for life.” Laws 1976, 1st Ex.Sess., Ch. 1, § 5. Now 21 O.S.Supp.1979, § 701.11. [Emphasis added.] An earlier portion of that same section, “The jury, if its verdict be a unanimous recommendation of death, ...” is written in the subjunctive and includes the adjective “unanimous.” Clearly, this anticipates the situation here where the jury returned, after several hours, unable to unanimously assess death. The statutory consequence is that life imprisonment must be imposed by the judge.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.