discussing damage to private property caused by deleterious effects of “public improvement” on “adjoining” property
How later courts described this case
- discussing damage to private property caused by deleterious effects of “public improvement” on “adjoining” property
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
McCOMB, J.
I dissent. I would reverse the judgment for the reasons expressed by Mr. Justice Ashburn in the opinion prepared by him for the District Court of Appeal, (Cal.App.) 5 Cal.Rptr. 808 .
Schauer, J., concurred.
Appellants’ petition for a rehearing was denied January 4, 1961. Schauer, J., and McComb, J., were of the opinion that the petition should be granted.