Opinion

Johnson v. State

  • 442 N.E.2d 1065
  • 1982 Ind. LEXIS 1067
Court
Indiana Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 22, 1982
Status
Published
Author
Prentice
On the bench
Pivarnik, Givan, Debruler, Hunter, Prentice
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 5.0%

The opinion

PRENTICE, Justice,

concurring in result.

I concur in the result reached by the majority, but for the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in Hoskins v. State, (1982) Ind., 441 N.E.2d 419, 429 , I disagree with its treatment of Issue II. Where no death penalty is imposed, there is no With-erspoon issue before the Court, and I believe that should be the sole basis for the decision upon that question.

HUNTER, J., concurs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.