Opinion

Johnson v. Nasi

  • 50 Wash. 2d 87
  • 309 P.2d 380
  • 1957 Wash. LEXIS 302
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 4, 1957
Status
Published
Author
Hill
On the bench
Schwellenbach, Hill
Cited by
49 cases

“The burden of proving a contract, whether express or implied, is on the party asserting it, and he must prove each essential fact, including the existence of a mutual intention.”

How later courts described this case

  • “The burden of proving a contract, whether express or implied, is on the party asserting it, and he must prove each essential fact, including the existence of a mutual intention.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Hill, C. J.

(concurring in the result) — I concur in the result, but not in the statement regarding the necessity of *93 RCW 5.60.030. In my opinion it should be greatly modified, but until it is so modified, it is the law.

May 21, 1957. Petition for rehearing denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.