Opinion

Fraenkel v. Trescony

  • 48 Cal. 2d 378
  • 309 P.2d 819
  • 1957 Cal. LEXIS 191
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 19, 1957
Status
Published
Author
Carter
On the bench
Spence, Schauer, Carter
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 4.9%

“[a] farm is generally defined ‘as a tract of land used for raising crops or rearing animals — one devoted to agriculture, stock raising or some allied industry’ ” (quoting Board of Supervisors v. Cothran, 84 Cal.App.2d 679, 682, 191 P.2d 506 (1948))

How later courts described this case

  • “[a] farm is generally defined ‘as a tract of land used for raising crops or rearing animals — one devoted to agriculture, stock raising or some allied industry’ ” (quoting Board of Supervisors v. Cothran, 84 Cal.App.2d 679, 682, 191 P.2d 506 (1948))

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

CARTER, J.

I dissent.

I concur in the views expressed in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Schauer and for the reasons there stated and also for the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in Fraenkel v. Bank of America, 40 Cal.2d 845 at page 851 [ 256 P.2d 569 ], I would reverse the judgment.

Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied May 15, 1957. Shenk, J., Carter, J., and Schauer, J., were of the opinion that the petition should be granted.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.