Opinion

Stockberger v. Meridian Mutual Insurance

  • 182 Ind. App. 566
  • 395 N.E.2d 1272
Court
Indiana Court of Appeals
Filed
Oct 25, 1979
Status
Published
Author
Garrard
On the bench
Staton, Garrard, Hoffman
Cited by
56 cases

stating the agent's lability "could not arise unless the agent had sufficiently definite directions from the principal to enable the agent to consummate the final insurance contract," and noting that there is a corresponding duty on the part of the insured to provide the agent with necessary information

How later courts described this case

  • stating the agent's lability "could not arise unless the agent had sufficiently definite directions from the principal to enable the agent to consummate the final insurance contract," and noting that there is a corresponding duty on the part of the insured to provide the agent with necessary information
  • recognizing that contracts to procure insurance may be “oral or written”
  • policy defined "automobile" as a vehicle required to be registered
  • coverage for accident occurring outside thirty day period barred due to failure to comply with notice requirement

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

GARRARD, P. J.,

concurs as to Meridian Mutual Insurance Company; and, concurs in result as to Harvey Clary.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.