Opinion

Carr v. Preslar

  • 73 S.D. 610
  • 47 N.W.2d 497
  • 1951 S.D. LEXIS 57
Court
South Dakota Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 17, 1951
Status
Published
Author
Sickel
On the bench
Smith, Rudolph, Roberts, Hayes, Sickel
Cited by
29 cases

The opinion

SICKEL, J.

(concurring specially). I agree that judgment in this case must be reversed. The payment of the sum of $78.25 was nothing more than an acknowledgment of the agreement by Preslar to pay Carr and Krogmaii five per cent of the increased consideration which Preslar was to receive under the Payne lease. The judgment was not an adjudication as to the amounts which might become due to Carr and Krogman as a share of the Preslar royalties.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.