Opinion

Kullbom v. Kullbom

  • 209 Neb. 145
  • 306 N.W.2d 844
  • 1981 Neb. LEXIS 892
Court
Nebraska Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 12, 1981
Status
Published
Author
McCown
On the bench
Boslaugh, Brodkey, Clinton, Coady, McCown
Cited by
34 cases

cases discussing deferred compensation benefits

How later courts described this case

  • cases discussing deferred compensation benefits

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

McCown, J.,

concurring.

Some cautionary comments may be appropriate in this case. Here the value of the pension was stipulated and the methods of valuation discussed in the opinion are those which have been approved by various courts. Rights under pension contracts vary greatly and in most cases the court has no power to alter the terms of the contract or provide for its payment in any fashion other than that required by the contract. The terms of the pension contract also affect the valuation of the pension itself.

The majority opinion does not require any specific methods of valuation to be used by the District Court nor restrict its broad discretion in valuing pension rights. Neither does the majority opinion imply that pensions themselves must be divided in kind between the parties but only that the value of any pension or retirement plan shall be included as a part of the marital estate.

Clinton, J., joins in this concurrence.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.