legislature intended “to apply the minimum contacts rule where it does not offend traditional concepts of fair play and substantial justice”
How later courts described this case
- legislature intended “to apply the minimum contacts rule where it does not offend traditional concepts of fair play and substantial justice”
- opinion by McCown, J.
- “an action for divorce is universally considered to be an action in rem”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Spencer, J.,
concurring in the result.
I concur in the result herein. I restrict my concurrence to the fact that the defendant was personally served with process and the following language of the opinion: “The evidence in this case establishes that the defendant continuously and systematically maintained his family in a permanent home in Lincoln, Nebraska, and that that particular domicile was established in 1962. The defendant has failed to carry the. burden of proof that a change of that domicile took place.”