Opinion

Board of Education v. Schmidt

  • 64 Ill. App. 3d 513
  • 21 Ill. Dec. 291
  • 381 N.E.2d 400
  • 1978 Ill. App. LEXIS 3381
Court
Appellate Court of Illinois
Filed
Sep 29, 1978
Status
Published
Author
Barry
On the bench
Scott, Barry, Alloy
Cited by
5 cases

The opinion

BARRY, P. J., concurs.

Mr. JUSTICE ALLOY, specially concurring:

I agree with the result reached in the proposed opinion filed in this case. I feel, however, that since the trial court’s decision was based upon the fact of nondelegability of governmental powers doctrine, and a construction of a clause in the union contract, the conclusion to affirm should be based on those considerations. I believe that the court’s conclusion that, to the extent that the contract provides for arbitration of the question of timing of salary adjustments, the contract is invalid and unenforceable, should be supported.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.