concluding evidence indicating a sexual abuse perpetrator’s sexual interest or relationship with a victim is “highly probative” and “not unfairly prejudicial”
How later courts described this case
- concluding evidence indicating a sexual abuse perpetrator’s sexual interest or relationship with a victim is “highly probative” and “not unfairly prejudicial”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
JUSTICE BAKER,
concurring.
¶74 I agree that any error in the admission of the recordings of the pretext calls was harmless. I also agree that the District Court properly admitted the challenged photographs. I therefore join paragraphs 45 through 51 of the Court’s discussion of Issue One and all of its discussion with respect to Issue Two.
JUSTICE RICE joins in the concurring Opinion of JUSTICE BAKER.