Opinion

Novick v. Myers

  • 330 Or. 351
  • 7 P.3d 518
  • 2000 Ore. LEXIS 393
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 8, 2000
Status
Published
Author
Van Hoomissen
On the bench
Carson, Van Hoomissen
Cited by
3 cases

Distinguished

  • Distinguished by Novick/Crew v. Myers, 337 Or. 568 (2004)

    Novick is distinguishable.
    Oregon Supreme CourtNov 18, 2004Read it

The opinion

VAN HOOMISSEN, J.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. In my view, the Attorney General’s certified ballot title substantially complies with the requirements of ORS 250.035 (1997). ORS 250.085(5).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.