Opinion

Lonnie A. Overton v. R. James Nicholson

  • 20 Vet. App. 494
  • 2006 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1133
  • 2006 WL 3059926
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Oct 27, 2006
Status
Published
On the bench
Greene, Kasold, Hagel, Moorman, Lance, Davis, Schoelen
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 57.2%

denying full-Court consideration; Hagel, J., Davis, J., and Schoelen, J., dissenting

How later courts described this case

  • denying full-Court consideration; Hagel, J., Davis, J., and Schoelen, J., dissenting

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

During the internal circulation of the panel decision in this matter, three judges requested full-Court consideration. See the Court’s Internal Operating Procedures ¶ V(b)(5).

On consideration of the foregoing, and it appearing that there is no majority in favor of the request for full-Court consideration, it is

ORDERED that full-Court consideration is DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.