Opinion

George R. Theiss v. Anthony J. Principi

  • 18 Vet. App. 480
  • 2004 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 717
  • 2004 WL 2615320
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Nov 18, 2004
Status
Published
On the bench
Tvers, Steinberg, Greene, Kasold, Hagel
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On July 27, 2004, in a panel decision, the Court vacated the April 6, 2001, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that determined that the appellant was not entitled to additional non-service-connected pension benefits for dependents under section 1521(c) of title 38, U.S.Code, for his 18-year-old son, who was attending a State-of-Wisconsin-approved home school, and remanded the matter to the Board for readjudication. On August 17, 2004, the Secretary filed a timely motion for reconsideration, or, in the alternative, for full Court review. “Motions for a full-Court decision are not favored. Ordinarily they will not be granted unless such action is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions or to resolve a question of exceptional important.” U.S. Vet.Apf. R. 35(c).

Upon consideration of the foregoing and the prior pleadings of the parties, it is

ORDERED, by the panel, that the motion for reconsideration is denied. It is

ORDERED, by the full Court, that the motion for a full-Court decision is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.