Opinion

Kane v. Principi

  • 17 Vet. App. 97
  • 2003 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 385
  • 2003 WL 21222011
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
May 28, 2003
Status
Published
Author
Steinberg
On the bench
Farley, Ivers, Steinberg
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.0%

The opinion

*104 STEINBERG, Judge,

concurring:

I concur in the opinion of the Court except for part II.D. The Court is not called upon to address the VCAA here because “neither party ... has argued that application of the VCAA could be beneficial to the appellant.” Williams (Shirley) v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 189, 199 (2001) (en banc) (Kramer, C.J., with whom Steinberg, J., joined, stating separately).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.