Opinion

Carpenter v. Principi

  • 16 Vet. App. 102
  • 2002 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 90
  • 2002 WL 233460
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Feb 15, 2002
Status
Published
Author
Steinberg
On the bench
Kramer, Farley, Holdaway, Ivers, Steinberg, Greene
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.0%

The opinion

STEINBERG, Judge,

dissenting:

I voted to grant full Court reconsideration in this case, for the reasons stated in my dissent to the June 21, 2001, en banc opinion, Carpenter v. Principi, 15 Vet.App. 64, 79 (2001) (Steinberg, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), except for part II.C.l., regarding the Court’s jurisdiction in terms of the failure to discuss section 402 of the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act, Pub.L. No. 100-687, § 402 , 102 Stat. 4105 , 4122 (1988) [hereinafter VJRA § 402], which has been repealed by the Veterans Education and Benefits Expansion Act of 2001, Pub.L. No. 107-103, § 603 (a), 115 Stat. 976 , 999; see also id. at § 603(d) (making repeal of VJRA § 402 applicable to all pending and subsequent claims). I therefore respectfully dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.