Opinion

Livesay v. Principi

  • 14 Vet. App. 324
  • 2001 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 471
  • 2001 WL 402610
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Apr 19, 2001
Status
Published
On the bench
Kramer, Farley, Holdaway, Ivers, Steinberg, Greene
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.0%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Veteran Wayne Livesay appeals, pro se, two December 23,1999, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decisions. In the first decision, the Board determined that neither a December 1985 Board decision denying a claim for service connection for a chronic disorder of the larynx nor a November 1987 Board decision denying a claim on reconsideration was the product of clear and unmistakable error (CUE). In the second decision, the Board denied Mr. Livesay’s claim for an effective date earlier than January 2, 1997, for his service-connected disorder of the larynx, including laryngeal carcinoma.

While this appeal has been pending, the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub.L. No. 106-475, 114 Stat. 2096 (Nov. 9, 2000) (VCAA), was enacted. The VCAA, among other things, amended 38 U.S.C. § 5103 to clarify VA’s duty to notify claimants and their representatives of any information or evidence that is necessary to substantiate their claims. The VCAA also created § 5103A, which specified VA’s duty to assist.

On November 15, 2000, this appeal was stayed pending possible arrangements for representation of Mr. Livesay. Thereafter, Mr. Livesay notified the Court that he did not wish to have representation. On December 7, 2000, the Court revoked its November 15, 2000, order and submitted the case to a panel. On February 28, 2001, this case was submitted to the full Court for a decision.

On March 8, 2001, the National Organization of Veterans Advocates (NOVA) filed an unopposed (by either Mr. Livesay or the Secretary) motion for leave to file an amicus brief. On March 19, 2001, the Secretary filed a “Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief and Clarification of the Secretary’s Position Regarding NOVA’s Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief.”

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that NOVA’s motion for leave to file an amicus brief is granted. It is further

ORDERED that the Secretary’s motion for leave to file a supplemental brief is granted. It is further

ORDERED that, not later than 30 days after the date of this order, the Secretary file with the Court and serve on Mr. Live-say and the amicus curiae a supplemental brief on the potential impact, if any, of the VCAA on Mr. Livesay’s claims. See generally 38 U.S.C. §§ 5109A, 5110, 7111; Disabled American Veterans v. Gober, 234 F.3d 682 (Fed.Cir.2000); Holliday v. Principi, 14 Vet.App. 280 (2001); Smith (Claudus) v. Gober, 14 Vet.App. 227 (2000); cf. Pierce v. Principi, 240 F.3d 1348 (Fed.Cir.2001). It is further

*325 ORDERED that, not later than 15 days after service of the Secretary’s supplemental brief, Mr. Livesay may file a reply thereto addressing the same issue stated above. It is further

ORDERED that NOVA file an amicus brief within the same time period allotted to Mr. Livesay in the preceding paragraph.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.