Opinion

Kristin Perry v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.

  • 681 F.3d 1065
  • 2012 WL 1994574
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Jun 5, 2012
Status
Published
Author
Hawkins
On the bench
O'Scannlain, Reinhardt, Hawkins, Smith, Bybee, Bea
Cited by
4 cases

The opinion

REINHARDT and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges,

concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc:

We are puzzled by our dissenting colleagues’ unusual reliance on the President’s views regarding the Constitution, especially as the President did not discuss the narrow issue that we decided in our opinion. We held only that under the particular circumstances relating to California’s Proposition 8, that measure was invalid. In line with the rules governing judicial resolution of constitutional issues, we did not resolve the fundamental question that both sides asked us to: whether the Constitution prohibits the states from banning same-sex marriage. That question may be decided in the near future, but if so, it should be in some other case, at some other time.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.