Opinion

Rickey Brown v. Parker Drilling Offshore Corporation

  • 444 F.3d 457
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7647
  • 2006 WL 775110
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Mar 28, 2006
Status
Published
On the bench
Benavides, Clement, DeMOSS, Dennis, Higginbotham, Judge's, King, Per Curiam, Stewart, Wiener
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 49.0%

stating panel majority "usurped the jury's Seventh Amendment function", improperly "replacing the jury's verdict with a verdict of its own"

How later courts described this case

  • stating panel majority "usurped the jury's Seventh Amendment function", improperly "replacing the jury's verdict with a verdict of its own"

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in active service not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. and 5th Cir. R. 35), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.