Opinion

United States v. Fausto Morales Santos

  • 235 F.3d 1105
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 33745
  • 2000 WL 1898812
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Filed
Dec 27, 2000
Status
Published
Author
Beam
On the bench
Beam, Wollman, Lay
Cited by
25 cases

concluding that Article 36 does not create a judicially enforceable individual right to be informed of a right to consular notification upon arrest

How later courts described this case

  • concluding that Article 36 does not create a judicially enforceable individual right to be informed of a right to consular notification upon arrest
  • stating that the Convention confers "no individually enforceable right under Article 36 to be informed of a right to consular notification. . . ."
  • concluding that the Vienna Convention does not confer on private citizens rights enforceable in federal court
  • holding that criminal defendant must show prejudice to justify suppression as remedy for VCCR violation

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BEAM, Circuit Judge, concurring.

I join the court’s opinion without reservation. I write only to note that if it had been necessary for the court to decide the issue, I would have adopted the reasoning of those courts that have found that there is no individually enforceable right under Article 36 to be informed of a right to consular notification that attaches upon arrest in a manner similar to the right to receive a Miranda warning.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.