Opinion

Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of Justice

  • 183 F.3d 1161
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 7637
  • 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 954
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5976
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 17731
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Jul 28, 1999
Status
Published
On the bench
Reinhardt, Kozinski, Kleinfeld, Graber, Pregerson, Hawkins
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 60.2%

"The plain and ordinary meaning of 'activity' clearly does not exclude hiring or employing workers. Indeed, putting people to work is often the chief 'activity' of municipalities.”

How later courts described this case

  • "The plain and ordinary meaning of 'activity' clearly does not exclude hiring or employing workers. Indeed, putting people to work is often the chief 'activity' of municipalities.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Order; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.