Opinion

Jack W. Friend v. Ronald Kolodzieczak

  • 72 F.3d 1386
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Dec 21, 1995
Status
Published
On the bench
Pregerson, Ferguson, O'Scannlain
Cited by
45 cases
Authority
More cited than 93.1%

holding that interest is calculated from the date of judgment unconditionally entitling the prevailing party to attorney fees

How later courts described this case

  • holding that interest is calculated from the date of judgment unconditionally entitling the prevailing party to attorney fees
  • observing that post-judgment interest applies to 22 1 awards of costs and runs from the date that entitlement was secured, rather than from the 2 date that the exact quantity was set
  • observing that 7 post-judgment interest applies to awards of costs and runs from the date that entitlement 8 was secured, rather than from the date that the exact quantity was set
  • affirming district court's holding that "[i]nterest runs from the date that entitlement to fees is secured, rather than from the date that the exact quantity of fees is set"

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

AMENDED ORDER, DISSENT, AND DENIAL OF REHEARING

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Before: PREGERSON, FERGUSON, and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.