Opinion

Kenrich Petrochemicals, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

  • 893 F.2d 1468
  • 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2417
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 970
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Filed
Jan 29, 1990
Status
Published
On the bench
Becker, Garth, Greenberg, Higginbotham, Leon, Mansmann, Sloviter, Stapleton
Cited by
13 cases

"Absent a showing of abuse of discretion or actual prejudice," a challenge to a failure to produce documents prior to an NLRB hearing will be rejected

How later courts described this case

  • "Absent a showing of abuse of discretion or actual prejudice," a challenge to a failure to produce documents prior to an NLRB hearing will be rejected
  • “[N]either the [C]onstitution nor the Administrative Procedure Act confer[s] a right to discovery in federal administrative proceedings.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

. The NLRB has filed a petition for rehearing in banc “insofar as the panel majority declined to enforce the Board’s order requiring Supervisor Helen Chizmar reinstated with back pay.” A majority of the active judges of the court have voted for rehearing in banc as to Helen Chizmar. A rehearing in banc is hereby granted solely on the issue of whether the Board’s order should be enforced as to Helen Chizmar. Solely as it pertains to Helen Chizmar, the panel’s opinion is vacated at 893 F.2d 1480 -1482, and we stay the entry of any judgment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.