Opinion

William S. Smith, Jr., and Marion R. Smith v. Cooper/t. Smith Corp.

  • 846 F.2d 325
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Aug 1, 1988
Status
Published
On the bench
Van Graafeiland, Johnson, Jolly, Clark, Gee, Rubin, Reavley, Politz, King, Williams, Garwood, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith
Cited by
12 cases

modification of stock purchase agreement was purchase or sale within the meaning of section 10(b)

How later courts described this case

  • modification of stock purchase agreement was purchase or sale within the meaning of section 10(b)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.