Opinion

Eugene Rice v. Ronald C. Marshall

  • 816 F.2d 1126
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5326
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Apr 24, 1987
Status
Published
Author
Jones
On the bench
Lively, Jones, Guy
Cited by
20 cases
Authority
More cited than 25.5%

where defendant was acquitted of possessing a weapon as a convicted felon, jury must have reached verdict based on the possession issue where his status as a convicted felon was uncontested

How later courts described this case

  • where defendant was acquitted of possessing a weapon as a convicted felon, jury must have reached verdict based on the possession issue where his status as a convicted felon was uncontested

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge,

concurring.

I concur fully in the Chief Judge’s opinion. I write separately only to express my belief that the failure of counsel at Rice’s second trial to object to the handgun evidence constituted ineffective assistance that would itself have satisfied the cause and prejudice standard. See Murray v. Carrier, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2639, 2646 , 91 L.Ed.2d 397 (1986); accord Cook v. Foltz, 814 F.2d 1109, 1113 (6th Cir.1987) (Merritt, J., concurring).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.