Opinion

Phyllis S. Stones v. Los Angeles Community College District, Leslie Koltai, and Mary E. Lee

  • 796 F.2d 270
  • 41 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,563
  • 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 710
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27674
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Aug 1, 1986
Status
Published
Author
Chambers
On the bench
Chambers, Anderson, Norris
Cited by
20 cases

because plaintiff did not establish racial discrimination under Sec. 1981 using McDonnell Douglas test, relief under Sec. 1983 was likewise foreclosed

How later courts described this case

  • because plaintiff did not establish racial discrimination under Sec. 1981 using McDonnell Douglas test, relief under Sec. 1983 was likewise foreclosed
  • the fact that claims lacked merit meant panel did not have to try to answer the “quite difficult-question whether judgment against the [college] would violate the Eleventh Amendment”
  • Finding of no intentional discrimination under § 1981 forecloses relief under § 1983
  • describing intent required under § 1981

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge,

concurring:

I concur in Judge Norris’ opinion. There were disputed questions of fact here. The district court could have found in favor of Stones on these questions, but it did not do so. It found in favor of the School District and the other named defendants. The result was not clearly erroneous.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.