No jurisdiction under § 301 where there was no employer-employee relationship between defendants and plaintiff union’s employees
How later courts described this case
- No jurisdiction under § 301 where there was no employer-employee relationship between defendants and plaintiff union’s employees
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
EDWARDS, Chief Judge,
concurring.
The equities in this case appear to me to favor plaintiffs. It is equally clear, however, that Supreme Court case law, particularly NLRB v. Burns International Security Services, 406 U.S. 272 , 92 S.Ct. 1571 , 32 L.Ed.2d 61 (1972), and Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board, 417 U.S. 249 , 94 S.Ct. 2236 , 41 L.Ed.2d 46 (1974), lends strong legal support to the defendants. The result which Judge Celebrezze has written for appears to be mandated by the Burns and Howard Johnson cases, and I concur in his opinion.