Opinion

United States v. Consolidation Coal Company, a Corporation, Robert Lasick, Richard Schrickel, Francis Leo Marks, Raymond Zitko, Individuals

  • 560 F.2d 214
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Sep 16, 1977
Status
Published
Author
Engel
On the bench
Celebrezze, Engel, Cecil
Cited by
26 cases

holding that a warrant was properly issued upon complaint by a former employee: “To deny warrant applications solely because criminal probable cause is lacking would frustrate compliance review and defeat attainment of the policy objectives of the Act.”

How later courts described this case

  • holding that a warrant was properly issued upon complaint by a former employee: “To deny warrant applications solely because criminal probable cause is lacking would frustrate compliance review and defeat attainment of the policy objectives of the Act.”
  • search under Federal Coal Mine Health & Safety Act of 1969
  • Federal Coal Mine Health & Safety Act of 1969

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ENGEL, Circuit Judge,

concurring.

While I find myself in general agreement with much of the majority opinion, certain issues relating to administrative searches and seizures covered therein are sufficiently troublesome to persuade me that we should save their resolution until the case arises which demands it. Since I am fully satisfied that the government’s affidavits meet the more stringent standards of Aguilar and Spinelli and since this is sufficient to uphold the search and seizure in any event, I concur in reversal and remand.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.