Opinion

Jerry Wayne Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc. And Williams-Mcwilliams Co., Inc., Defendants

  • 549 F.2d 314
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Jun 17, 1977
Status
Published
Author
Ingraham
On the bench
Wisdom, Ingraham, Grooms
Cited by
183 cases
Authority
More cited than 25.1%

Overruled on other grounds by Charles D. Gautreaux v. Scurlock Marine, Inc., 107 F.3d 331 (1997)

holding that defendant waived his objection to service of process by not stating it with particularity in his motion challenging venue under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688

How later courts described this case

  • holding that defendant waived his objection to service of process by not stating it with particularity in his motion challenging venue under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688
  • holding that Jones Act employer had a responsibility to inspect a third party's vessel "to take precautions in order to provide its employees with a safe working place"
  • holding that merely mentioning in a brief that the district court erred, absent any specific argument as to how the court erred, waives the issue on appeal
  • claimant assisted in welding cracks on vessel, worked with the crew in washing the deck, and helped load and unload the barge alongside the crew

Written by the judges who cited it.

Later courts went against this

  • Overruled on other grounds by Charles D. Gautreaux v. Scurlock Marine, Inc., 107 F.3d 331 (1997)

    549 F.2d 314, 329 (5th Cir. 1977), overruled on other grounds by Gautreaux, 107 F.3d at 339
    Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitFeb 28, 199710 citing opinionsother groundsRead it
  • Overruled on other grounds by Ruth Culver, Cross-Appellees v. Slater Boat Co., Cross Europirates International, Inc., and Cross- Appellees-Appellants v. Odeco Drilling, Cross, 688 F.2d 280 (1982)

    549 F.2d 314, 323-24 (5th Cir.1977), overruled on other grounds, Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280, 288 & 310 (5th Cir.1982),
    Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitSep 22, 19824 citing opinionsother groundsRead it

The opinion

INGRAHAM, Circuit Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur in Judge Wisdom’s opinion despite initial reservations about venue as to Hill. Energy Resources Group, Inc. v. Energy Resources Corp., 297 F.Supp. 232 (S.D. Tex.1969), an opinion authored by me, illustrates the problems encountered in large multi-district states. The State of Texas, whose statute of incorporation is the basis for venue in this suit, has recognized these difficulties and has enacted a complex set of rules governing venue. However, I agree that § 1404(a) may be utilized to alleviate such problems in the federal courts.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.