Opinion

Feed Service Corporation v. Kent Feeds, Inc., and Grain Processing Corporation

  • 528 F.2d 756
Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Filed
Mar 19, 1976
Status
Published
Author
Stevens
On the bench
Stevens, Fairchild, Hastings
Cited by
6 cases

The opinion

STEVENS, Circuit Justice

(dissenting in part):

Although I would not sustain the award of treble damages and attorneys’ fees, I am not persuaded that the finding of infringement is clearly erroneous. I agree with Judge Hastings’ conclusions that the patent is valid and that the claims only cover the addition of alcohol in feed supplements, but it seems to me that the incorporation of fermented molasses is a method of adding ethanol.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.