holding that Constitution does not require that a hearing precede the termination of a public employee and that appellants’ due process rights were not violated where their dismissals were sustained after plenary administrative and judicial hearings
How later courts described this case
- holding that Constitution does not require that a hearing precede the termination of a public employee and that appellants’ due process rights were not violated where their dismissals were sustained after plenary administrative and judicial hearings
- the Constitution does not require that a hearing must precede the termination of a teacher or a public employee
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
*1000 ON REHEARING EN BANC
Before SWYGERT, Chief Judge, ENOCH, Senior Circuit Judge, and FAIRCHILD, CUMMINGS, PELL, STEVENS, SPRECHER and TONE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
On consideration of the briefs and the arguments presented at the rehearing en banc, the judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided vote.