enforcing Gissel Order where employer interrogated employees, promised benefits if the union lost, prohibited solicitation, and otherwise interfered with unionization efforts
How later courts described this case
- enforcing Gissel Order where employer interrogated employees, promised benefits if the union lost, prohibited solicitation, and otherwise interfered with unionization efforts
- noting that the NLRB is obligated "to maintain a consistent approach in [its] unit determinations"
- “[B]oth administrative expertise and judicial efficiency demand that we do not sit as a super-reviewing board to determine the correctness of every .unit determination made by the Board.”
- pre-petition promise of benefits unlawful
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge
(specially concurring):
I concur in the result.