Opinion

Carolyn Eaton v. New Hanover County Board of Education

  • 459 F.2d 684
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9892
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Apr 26, 1972
Status
Published
Author
Bryan
On the bench
Haynsworth, Bryan, Winter, Butzner, Russell, Field
Cited by
9 cases
Authority
More cited than 24.9%

The opinion

ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge

(concurring specially):

I agree that the findings of the District Court warranted its conclusion that the New Hanover County School System was not an integrated system. Nor do I disagree with the remedies decreed, but I do make this reservation: if any of the existing or proposed busing is for the purpose of maintaining a racial balance in the public schools, then to the approval by the majority opinion of that busing, I must dissent.

It is my understanding that no such transportation has ever been declared by the Supreme Court as required of the States by the Constitution. Swann v. *687 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.S. 1, 24 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971). I recognize that busing may be required where necessary to establish integration in the public schools. However, this is far different from busing solely to assure racial balances in the integrated schools. I have consistently so stressed. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 431 F.2d 138, 155 (4 Cir. 1970), aff’d 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971), supra.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.