“There is no Sixth Amendment requirement that [defendants] also be allowed to confront [the ■witness] at a preliminary hearing prior to trial.”
How later courts described this case
- “There is no Sixth Amendment requirement that [defendants] also be allowed to confront [the ■witness] at a preliminary hearing prior to trial.”
- “There is no Sixth Amendment requirement that [defendants] also be allowed to confront [witnesses] at a preliminary hearing prior to trial.”
- “There is no Sixth Amendment requirement that [defendants] ... be allowed to confront [witnesses] at a preliminary hearing prior to trial.”
- “The purpose of sequestering is, the cases agree, to protect the jury from interference.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM:
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed on behalf of Scott, Bar- *679 field and Chapman in the above entitled and numbered cause be, and the same is hereby DENIED.