Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. In the Matter of Joques Egan

  • 450 F.2d 199
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Filed
Dec 14, 1971
Status
Published
Author
Forman
On the bench
Forman, Aldisert, Gibbons, Hastie, Seitz, Van Dusen, Adams, Rosenn
Cited by
59 cases

“It seems beyond question that a district court may not compel the violation of an express congressional prohibition.”

How later courts described this case

  • “It seems beyond question that a district court may not compel the violation of an express congressional prohibition.”
  • violation of statute and Fourth’ Amendment

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

FORMAN, Circuit Judge

(dissenting).

I was a member of the panel that heard argument in the above-named ease on January 29, 1971, the reargument before the court en banc on April 5, 1971, and participated in the conference thereafter. Subsequently I was deterred by illness from filing an opinion therein. Pursuant to the court’s gracious reservation of the opportunity for me to express my decision after the filing of its opinion on May 28, 1971, I desire to join in the dissenting opinion of Judge Gibbons.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.