Opinion

John J. Goodrich v. Arnold C. Harmsen and Burke P. Lokey, Burke P. Lokey v. Arnold C. Harmsen and John J. Goodrich

442 F.2d 377
58 C.C.P.A. 1144

Court: Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Filed: May 25, 1971
Status: Published
Author: Baldwin
On the bench: Baldwin, Rich, Almond, Lane
Cited by: 20 cases
Authority: More cited than 24.9%

The opinion

BALDWIN, Judge

(concurring).

It is my belief that the party Harmsen could not prevail in this case even were his evidence convincing beyond a shadow of a doubt. The law as announced by this court in Brokaw v. Vogel, 429 F.2d 476 , 57 CCPA 1296 (1970) is controlling. For this reason I do not join the majority’s disparagement of Harmsen’s evidence. I agree with the rest of the opinion and therefore concur in result.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.