Opinion

Louis L. Walters v. The United States

  • 358 F.2d 957
  • 175 Ct. Cl. 215
  • 1966 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 210
Court
United States Court of Claims
Filed
Apr 15, 1966
Status
Published
Author
Laramore
On the bench
Laramore, Cowen, Durfee, Davis, Collins
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

LARAMORE, Judge

(dissenting):

I respectfully dissent for this reason: To recover, plaintiff must prove that at the time of his release he was not only unfit for service but that his incapacity was service-connected.

I think plaintiff has failed in his burden to prove that he in fact had a permanent incapacitating herniated disc at the time of his release. All the medical findings merely disclose that he had a probable herniated disc. Under these circumstances I cannot say that the action of the Secretary of the Navy, acting through the Naval Retiring Review Board and the Board for Correction of Naval Records, was arbitrary, capricious, erroneous in law, or contrary to the evidence. Accordingly, I would dismiss plaintiff’s petition.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.